Update Update
January 21, 2026 · 1 min reading
The Limits of Symbolic Refusal- a personal note
Much of our everyday opposition to Zionism focuses on delegitimization within immediate spaces. This includes boycotts, disruptions, efforts to sever academic partnerships, and challenges to cultural normalization. These actions matter as they interrupt complicity and fracture consensus. Yet they are not the full struggle.
Bana Abu Zuluf
bana@goodshepherdcollective.org
“Symbolic acts proliferate precisely because material sites of power are inaccessible, protected, or monopolized. Symbolic refusal migrates into culture, discourse, and morality when zionism’s “sovereignty”, “borders”, and armed force are structurally foreclosed from challenge. The issue is not in the strategy of confronting zionism where we are, but in mistaking its visibility for its decisiveness. That is why we hear well-meaning activists saying things like “well, it’s not like I can go and fight zionists in Palestine”. The question is why such a necessary confrontation is dressed in a cynical tone?”
Here is an important excerpt from my recent piece, 'The Limits of Symbolic Refusal—a personal note.' It's meant to give activists and organizers space to think about tactics, strategies, and how to assess whether they help Palestinians materially advance a program of liberation.
We’d encourage you to give it a read and sign up to be a financial contributor to TheCall.ps, our Substack where we pen our analysis and opinions. This is one way you can help to support the work of the Good Shepherd Collective.
Support
The Good Shepherd Collective rejects the model of large grants from liberal institutions because of the ways it can shape the work. Instead, we premise our work in the financial investments from individuals who believe in the future we're trying to build. Consider becoming a monthly donor.
Donate